New model of the Universe.

Formation of continents.

Look closely at the animation of two huge, diametrically opposed formations on the surface of the Earth's core (Earth Blobs). They cannot but be directly related to the formation of continents. They are both displaced in the same direction (east). From them to the east displaced continents. Compare with the official model of continent formation. These huge structures contradict the official model of continent formation.

Animation source link: The Unsolved Mystery of the Earth Blobs

The Cordillera - the Andes, the Iranian highlands - the Himalayas - are also two huge formations of a similar shape, also diametrically opposed to each other. Each of them are displaced east of their Earth Blobs. Cordillera - The Andes are displaced further from their Earth Blobs and are more split. Iranian Highlands - The Himalayas are closer to their Earth Blobs, and are displaced northward. 

New model of the Universe.

From the above, we can conclude that before the moment of the so-called “Big Bang” in the Universe there was a certain material sphere with a diameter of about 20 thousand km, the substance in which was in the stage of the limit of density (the state of singularity). Let’s call this sphere ProtoEarth.

As a result of certain processes at the Proto-Earth’s poles two PreContinents were gradually formed – PreAmerica (North America, South America and Antarctica) and PreEurasia (Africa, Eurasia and Australia), in the centers of which the Sun and the Moon were gradually formed. Parallel to this, water was formed in a wide strip of the proto-Earth’s equator as a result of certain processes. At a certain moment, a critical mass difference accumulated at the poles, the equilibrium of the system was violated, the separation of the Sun and the Moon began, the proto-Earth’s axis of rotation shifted from conditional zero degrees to the current 23.5 degrees, and the formation of modern continents.

(a huge trail of clearly cosmic origin between South America and Antarctica, animation of the trajectory of a solar eclipse shadow and a schematic drawing)

A few more arguments in favor of this model of the Universe:

- The coincidence of the apparent diameters of the Sun and the Moon in the sky.
- The coincidence of the axial periods of rotation of the Sun and the Moon (27 days).
- Only Mercury and Venus have no satellites.
- Only Mercury and Venus have incommensurably large periods of rotation around their axes 58 and 243 days, respectively (Earth, Mars – 1 day; Jupiter, Saturn – 16, 17 hours; Uranus, Neptune – 9, 10 hours).
- In each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side.

(schematic comparison of the official and new model of the Universe; ProtoEarth, Moon, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Mars and common center of masses between Earth and Sun)

Thus, it is very similar to the fact that the Universe looks approximately like on the Tycho Brahe's model of the Universe, only with the correction for the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around the common center of mass. The Oort cloud is the border of the Universe, where all the “stars” and “galaxies” formed from the proto-Earth mantle, with diameters not exceeding several tens of kilometers, are located. The diameter of the universe, presumably, does not exceed one light minute.

In all this, a correct understanding of the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around a common center of mass is very important. The ratio of diameters is approximately the same as in the animation (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller).

The nature of light and the size of the Universe.

A photon has energy and momentum (weight) but no mass. It is obvious that light is vibrations of some medium (ether). This environment cannot but have resistance, damping or absorbing light vibrations with time and distance. I will describe the essence in simple words so as not to complicate and not drag out the explanation.

1) Water waves.
They spread longer (in time) than sound, but at a shorter distance (at a lower speed). Distribution medium: water.

2) Sound waves.
The lifetime of sound waves is shorter than that of water waves, but the speed (and distance) is greater. Distribution medium: atmosphere (gas).

3) Light waves.
By analogy, the lifetime of light waves should be much shorter than the lifetime of sound waves, but since the speed of light is about 300,000 km/s - the propagation distance is greater. Distribution medium: ether.

(a schematic representation of a photon - a conventional unit of oscillation (wave) of the ether) Image text translation: The movement of one light wave (photon) from the source to complete attenuation and / or absorption by the medium (ether).

At the beginning of the 20th century, scientists rejected the completely plausible hypothesis of the Tired Light, began to carry out fortune-telling by redshifts of the spectrum (like on coffee grounds, only by the emission spectra), and billions of light years, black holes, dark energies, and distant, distant galaxies rushed.

Light years?

A photon cannot exist not only for years, but even for minutes. Example. Standing in the lake. You throw a stone. First you hear the sound, later the waves come. Waves on water, sound waves in a gaseous medium and light waves in ether are phenomena of the same nature, but of different orders due to the environment. If waves on water “live” for minutes, and sound waves in a gaseous medium “live” for seconds, then light waves in their medium (ether) “live” for a fraction of a second. All this depends on the power of the source of wave oscillations, so it can be assumed that light waves from the Sun can exist for several seconds, but not more (not minutes, and even less years).

Even if in the space environment (vacuum) there is no resistance, there is no heat exchange, then the distance is overcome (volume expansion with distance), which cannot occur absolutely without energy consumption. In addition, the space of the cosmic vacuum cannot be absolutely empty. There cannot but be certain, albeit minimal, resistance and heat transfer. Light years and 8 light minutes from Sun to Earth are physically impossible.

Again. Attentively. This is very important to understand. Overcoming distance in any environment, that is, regardless of the environment, cannot occur without energy consumption (or with zero energy consumption). Since a photon has a very low energy charge, and a very high speed of movement, and no medium (including space) can have absolutely zero resistance, then, accordingly, the lifetime (life) of one photon (wave oscillation of the medium - ether) is very short, not exceeding at least one minute.

Definition. The lifetime of a unit of wave oscillations (one wave) is inversely proportional to the speed of their propagation (or directly proportional to the inertia of the medium) and is directly proportional to the power of their source.

Since the ether is not scientifically recognized, it turns out that a photon is a conventional unit of wave oscillations of an incomprehensible medium? A photon has weight (energy and momentum), but no mass - it is obvious that this is an oscillation (wave) of some medium (ether).

Ordinary waves have a medium - water.
Sound waves have a medium - a gas (atmosphere).
Do light and radio waves have a medium? The ether has not yet been allegedly proven.

The aquatic environment is inhabited.
The gaseous environment (atmosphere) is inhabited.
Is the ether inhabited? Where do UFOs come from? Where do the “aliens” (angels / demons) live?


If the distance from the Earth to the Sun were 150,000,000 km, that is, 8 light minutes, then the STEREO Ahead and STEREO Behind spacecraft would simply be impossible to control, and it would be impossible to receive any data from them. For example. STEREO A (itself being in constant motion in orbit) sends a signal to the Earth that flies in space for 8 minutes, and during this time the Earth moves in orbit for 8 minutes. * 60 sec. * 30 km/s = 14 400 km. Not to mention the enormous degree of radio signal scattering over distances of tens of millions of kilometers or several light minutes.

(animation of the movement of STEREO spacecrafts around the Sun)

There is a photo animation on the web that shows a solar flare in the direction of one of these satellites. The STEREO Ahead spacecraft supposedly moves along the Earth's orbit, that is, at the same distance from the Sun as the Earth. This is an animation of STEREO A photos from July 23, 2012.

The solar flare flew exactly in the direction of STEREO A. It began at almost exactly 03:00 (UTC), and the first visible particles of coronal matter (white ripples in the animation) flew to STEREO A at about 07:00 (UTC). If the distance from the Sun to the Earth's orbit (on which the STEREO spacecraft are located) were 150,000,000 km, as is officially believed, then the speed of coronal material particles would be 150,000,000 km. / 4 hours / 60 minutes / 60 seconds = about 10,000 km / s. - this is 3% of the speed of light, which is hardly physically possible.

The solar wind is a stream of ionized particles (mainly helium-hydrogen plasma) flowing out from the solar corona at a speed of 300-1200 km/s into the surrounding space.

In addition, it is generally known that the flow of coronal matter from a solar flare reaches the Earth's orbit (in which the STEREO spacecraft are supposedly located) in an average of 150,000,000 km. / 750 km / s / 60 sec. / 60 min. / 24 hours = ~ 2.5 - 3 days. But in fact, the animation of the photos turns out to be 07:00 (UTC) - 03:00 (UTC) = 4 hours. Looks like it turns out this way, because STEREO spacecrafts are located on the orbit of Venus (around the Sun), and SOHO spacecraft is located in common center of mass between the Earth and the Sun in the Solar System (Universe) with approximately the same parameters as in the schematic image below.

(ProtoEarth, Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars; common center of mass between Earth and Sun; distance to the Moon is about 100 000 km., distance to the Sun is about 300 000 km.; Oort Cloud is the border of the Universe where all the "stars" and "galaxies" located; the diameter of the Universe does not exceed one light minute)

The rotation of the Earth and the Sun, as two commensurate objects, around a common center of mass (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller).

Another small, but very interesting fact indirectly confirms my model of the Universe. On the American continents, there are armadillos in the wild, but no hedgehogs. In Africa and Eurasia, there are hedgehogs in the wild, but no armadillos.

Arial of armadillos and Arial of hedgehogs.
Hedgehogs and the Sun have thorns.
The armadillos and the Moon have no thorns.

1) Self-organization
2) Fundamental aspects of the Universe.

A few more arguments in favor of a new model of the Universe:

1) Traces from the Sun and Moon on the Earth's surface.

- Ratio of diameters approximately 3 to 1.
- Both have an eastern direction.
- Both have an eastern position (displaced to the east) relative to their PreContinents (PreAmerica and PreEurasia).
- Both have diametrically opposite locations on the surface of the Earth.

2) Why there was no rainbow on Earth before the Noah's Flood.

3) Factual (scientific) confirmation of the biblical Armageddon (End of the World).

4) Calculation of the diameter of Mars according to the new model of the Universe.

5) Moon size (diameter) calculation.

The trail from the moon on the surface of the earth.

The duration of an eclipse is directly proportional to the size of the object, all other things being equal (distance and speed). The duration of the total phase of a solar eclipse is 7.5 minutes (the Moon completely covers the Sun for 7.5 minutes). The duration of the total phase of the lunar eclipse is 108 minutes (the Earth completely covers the Sun for 108 minutes). With the same distance between the Moon and the Earth. At the same speed of the Moon (the orbit of the Moon moves with the speed of the Earth). The diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km. Therefore, the diameter of the Moon can be calculated using the following formula: 12 742 * (7.5 / 108) = 885 km. The official diameter of the Moon is 3,474 km. Moreover, the result of calculating the diameter of the Moon quite accurately coincides with the size of the track between South America and Antarctica (875 km. + - 25 km.), which confirms the calculation and minimizes probability of a simple coincidence.

Links to forums on the new model of the Universe (additional arguments):



Traces of the Sun and Moon on the Earth's surface.

Tectonic plates are formed under the pressure of a large mass, therefore they are also called continental plates. The Pacific plate is formed under the pressure of a homogeneous mass of water over a large area. Tectonic plates are large and irregular. The tectonic plates outlined in red rectangles (PHILIPPINE PLATE, COCOS PLATE, CARRIBEAN PLATE and SCOTIA PLATE) in the figure below are formed under the pressure of large masses that were once there, but now they are not there - under the pressure of the Sun and the Moon. In addition, the tectonic plates circled in the figure below completely repeat the outlines of traces on the Earth's surface.

The Sun flew farther from the Earth and left only one footprint on the surface (PHILIPPINE PLATE). The Moon several times hooked the Earth into its current orbit along an elliptical trajectory - left three tracks on the Earth's surface: COCOS PLATE, CARRIBEAN PLATE and SCOTIA PLATE.

Japan is the land of the rising Sun. The name of the country "Mexico" and the city of Mexico City are supposedly derived from the words metztli ("Moon") and xictli ("navel, middle"), thus meaning "middle of the Moon".

Final addition.

Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the sizes are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

It would be very difficult to hide such a global deception. A lot of people are engaged in this ... both professionals and amateurs ... Long ago the truth would come out ... And there is no big sense in such a deception. Something doesn't add up ...

1) Levels of access (secrecy).

2) There are several dozen spacecraft (not counting earth satellites). Several hundred well-paid people are engaged in non-dusty and not difficult direct service.

3) Lunar scam. 50 years ago, people allegedly flew to the Moon, and after 50 years of progress, both technologies are lost, and the spacesuits are not the same (NASA is postponing the flight to the Moon until 2025 due to problems with the development of spacesuits and ... lack of funding).

4) This is all richly seasoned with a 300-year history of theoretical astronomy with its black holes and distant, distant galaxies. Plus erroneous interpretations of astronomical observations. Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the sizes are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

The official model of the universe is not true. The official model of the Universe is a global deception, conspiracy, distortion. The actual structure of the Universe is the key to understanding very many important things (aspects of the Universe). Distortion of an important aspect of the Universe leads to a distortion of the Worldview.


Space exploration is useless and pointless. 90% of the global space industry budget is focused on space exploration. This is probably equal to the sum of all other spheres of human criminal activity. Money laundering requires the appearance of a socially beneficial activity. A striking example is money laundering through charitable (humanitarian) organizations.

Assumptions about distortions of official space calculations.

All celestial, orbital, trigonometric, mathematical calculations can have (and it seems to be so) one feature. They are all relatively correct. Take a close look at what I mean. Basic parameters such as distance, size and speed are highly interdependent and directly interdependent. Only one coefficient in the calculations directly affects the change in these three parameters in one direction or another. The mathematical concept may be correct, but the scale of the official model of the Universe is greatly overestimated, that is, cosmic velocities, distances and sizes are greatly overestimated. But this does not affect the proportions of the orbits. Hence, even though the scale is significantly overestimated, spaceships can (and they do) fly in the space of the solar system. The proportions are correct, the scale is incorrect, the calculations are relatively correct (only because of one incorrect coefficient * in the calculations, which directly affects the main cosmic parameters: distances, sizes and speeds).

* this incorrect coefficient may be the gravitational constant.

"The gravitational constant is a physical constant that is difficult to measure with high precision." (Wikipedia)

Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk


Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

default userpic